wiki.digitalmethods.net rapport :   Visitez le site

Données techniques du wiki.digitalmethods.net

Geo IP vous fournit comme la latitude, la longitude et l'ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Notre service GeoIP a trouvé l'hôte wiki.digitalmethods.net.Actuellement, hébergé dans Netherlands et son fournisseur de services est TransIP B.V. .

the related websites

savoirtoutfaire.com cgsecurity.org t4zone.info echolalie.org randonner-leger.org wikiinfi.com brestaeromodelisme.com wiki.scienceamusante.net 

Analyse d'en-tête HTTP

Les informations d'en-tête HTTP font partie du protocole HTTP que le navigateur d'un utilisateur envoie à appelé Apache contenant les détails de ce que le navigateur veut et acceptera de nouveau du serveur Web.

DNS

HtmlToText

webhome < dmi < foswiki you are here: foswiki > dmi web > webhome (05 apr 2017, erikborra ) edit attach projects by theme | tools | dmi course | faq | about digital objects | the site | the ordering device | the spheres | the webs | post-demographics | networked content | mapping controversies the digital methods initiative is a contribution to doing research into the "natively digital". consider, for example, the hyperlink, the thread and the tag. each may 'remediate' older media forms (reference, telephone chain, book index), and genealogical histories remain useful (bolter & grusin, 1999; elsaesser, 2005; kittler, 1995). at the same time new media environments - and the software-makers - have implemented these concepts, algorithmically, in ways that may resist familiar thinking as well as methods (manovich, 2005; fuller, 2007). in other words, the effort is not simply to import well-known methods - be they from humanities, social science or computing. rather, the focus is on how methods may change, however slightly or wholesale, owing to the technical specificities of new media. more... faq "how different are digital methods?" "i study virtual methods. how would i relate to what you are doing with 'digital methods'?" "you mentioned 'society' quite a bit. i am from humanities. how should we think about 'culture'? is there also a 'humanities' approach to your work?" "'distilling social trends from the internet' by digital methods is interesting, but it seems like something a journalist would like to do. is your work journalistic? is the work also theoretical? what's the difference?" "could you illustrate what you mean by the 'natively digital'? what's a clickable setting?" "how different are digital methods?" the web archiving specialist, niels brügger, has written: "[u]nlike other well-known media, the internet does not simply exist in a form suited to being archived, but rather is first formed as an object of study in the archiving, and it is formed differently depending on who does the archiving, when, and for what purpose" (brügger, 2005). that the object of study is co-constructed in the means by which it is 'tamed' or 'corralled' by method and technique is a classic point from the sociology and philosophy of science and elsewhere. for example, when one studies the internet archive, what stands out is not so much that the internet is archived, but how it is. unlike a web search engine, at archive.org's wayback machine, one queries a url, not a key word. moreover, one cannot 'surf' or search the web as it was at some given date. in other words, a series of decisions was taken on how to build the archive, and those decisions constrain the type of research one can perform. one can study the evolution of a single site (or multiple sites) over time by collecting snapshots from the dates that a page was indexed. one also can go back in time to a website for evidentiary purposes. is that how one may wish to study the history of the web? what kinds of research questions may be asked fruitfully and not asked, given the constraints? digital methods perhaps begin with coming to grips with given forms of objects under study. brügger seems to go a step further, however, in arguing that methodological standardisation is unlikely if not impossible. to brügger the form assumed by the object of study depends on its creator, in this case the particular archivist. does such a thought imply that digital method, if method remains the right word, is more of an art than a science, where the tacit knowledge and skill are paramount? can there be no instruments, only tools? data are less gathered, than they are sculpted, or 'scraped', as the term is known. perhaps 'data-mining' is appropriate in the sense that there is always some waste, or slurry, that runs off. digital methods may have to have more patience with the lack of exhaustiveness in data sets than would be the norm in other sciences. niels brügger, archiving websites: general considerations and strategies, centre for internet research, aarhus, 2005, http://www.cfi.au.dk/publikationer/archiving "i study virtual methods. how would i relate to what you are doing with 'digital methods'?" the origins of 'virtual methods' may lie in the u.k. virtual society? research program of the late 1990s (woolgar, 2002). in particular, the virtual society question mark was emphasized. the research challenged the then dominant division between the real and the virtual realms, empirically demonstrating instead the embeddedness of the internet in society. the desire to innovate methodologically saw perhaps its greatest challenge in ethnography, with the desire to put forward and defend a new strain of scholarship, 'virtual ethnography', that combined the terrains of 'the ground' with the online (hine, 2000; see also slater/miller, 2000). special skills, and methods, were developed to gain entry to and study communities now rooted both in the offline and the online. how should the introductory email message be written, and to whom? how should the online survey be designed? questions revolved around how to adapt methods from social science to the online environment. if one were to contrast the challenges of virtual methods with those of digital methods, one could begin by thinking about the embeddedness of society in the internet. thus the important question mark from the earlier research program shifts: virtual? society. the methods and skills developed here strive to put society on display. how can the internet be made to show what's happening in society? in this respect, the dutch newspaper, the nrc handelsblad, published an in-house study of home-grown right-wing websites over the past few years (nrc handelsblad, 2007). the remarkable line in the article, which seemed unusual for those accustomed to reading at least implicit distinctions between 'the real' and 'the virtual', read: "the internet reflects the increasing hardening [of the right-wing] in the netherlands."* thus here the web becomes the site to study social trends. more to the point, how improbable is it to study right-wing movement trends without the internet? the special skills once entailed how one would embed oneself successfully within the groups, and report with distance. now, the 'digital methods' question becomes, how to collect and analyze the data to distill such trends from the web? more... *"internet lijkt (...) de weerslag van de maatschappelijke verharding in nederland." nrc handelsblad, "opkomst en ondergang van extreemrechtse sites," 25 august 2007, http://www.nrc.nl/binnenland/article757820.ece/opkomst_en_ondergang_van_extreemrechtse_sites . also here . "you mentioned 'society' quite a bit. i am from humanities. how should we think about 'culture'? is there also a 'humanities' approach to your work?" "e-social science" is one term used to describe how to study the online now that the environments have become digital. normally the skills with which one collects data and forms them into something palatable for existing methods are under-emphasized. data cleaning is something that is taught tacitly, and the results are applied formally. (there is hardly ever a footnote on how one has cleaned the data, though there are occasionally cases that insist that the data have not been cleaned well.) here the cleaning is the issue. for example, it may come as a surprise both to the casual user as well as to the formal social scientist that a google search engine return has millions of results, but that one can only access 1,000 of them. there was a quip in the 1990s that it would take a scientist most all her life to go through the millions of results. well, there are only 1,000 to deal with. that is what google 'serves'. this is a simple example of the difference between a sense of the 'digital' and the internet, and less of a sense. "less of a sense" refers to the quest for exhaustiveness, prevalent in social science critiques of the humaniti

Analyse PopURL pour wiki.digitalmethods.net

https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/ToolNetvizz
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/DmiAbout
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/ToolGoogleScraper
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/ToolTrackerTracker
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/WinterSchool2017
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/AgeingPlaces
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/IssueImageAnalysis
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/Dmi/DmiSummerSchool
https://wiki.digitalmethods.net/MoM

Informations Whois

Whois est un protocole qui permet d'accéder aux informations d'enregistrement.Vous pouvez atteindre quand le site Web a été enregistré, quand il va expirer, quelles sont les coordonnées du site avec les informations suivantes. En un mot, il comprend ces informations;

Domain Name: digitalmethods.net
Registry Domain ID: 1413871280_DOMAIN_NET-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.rrpproxy.net
Registrar URL: http://www.transip.nl
Updated Date: 2017-05-02T18:30:15.0Z
Creation Date: 2008-03-03T19:45:48.0Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date: 2018-03-03T19:45:48.0Z
Registrar: Key-Systems GmbH
Registrar IANA ID: 269
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@key-systems.net
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +49.68949396850
Domain Status: ok https://icann.org/epp#ok
Registry Registrant ID: Not Available From Registry
Registrant Name: Richard Rogers
Registrant Organization: Digital Methods Initiative
Registrant Street: Turfdraagsterpad 9
Registrant City: AMSTERDAM
Registrant State/Province:
Registrant Postal Code: 1012 XT
Registrant Country: NL
Registrant Phone: +31.205253352
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Fax:
Registrant Fax Ext:
Registrant Email: devel@digitalmethods.net
Registry Admin ID: Not Available From Registry
Admin Name: Richard Rogers
Admin Organization:
Admin Street: Turfdraagsterpad 9
Admin City: AMSTERDAM
Admin State/Province:
Admin Postal Code: 1012 XT
Admin Country: NL
Admin Phone: +31.205253352
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin Fax:
Admin Fax Ext:
Admin Email: devel@digitalmethods.net
Registry Tech ID: Not Available From Registry
Tech Name: Emile den Tex
Tech Organization: Digital Methods Initiative
Tech Street: Turfdraagsterpad 9
Tech City: AMSTERDAM
Tech Postal Code: 1012 XT
Tech State/Province:
Tech Country: NL
Tech Phone: +31.205252980
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech Fax:
Tech Fax Ext:
Tech Email: devel@digitalmethods.net
Registry Billing ID: Not Available From Registry
Billing Name: Richard Rogers
Billing Organization:
Billing Street: Turfdraagsterpad 9
Billing City: AMSTERDAM
Billing State/Province:
Billing Postal Code: 1012 XT
Billing Country: NL
Billing Phone: +31.205253352
Billing Phone Ext:
Billing Fax:
Billing Fax Ext:
Billing Email: devel@digitalmethods.net
Name Server: ns1.sonologic.nl
Name Server: ns2.sonologic.nl
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN WHOIS Data Problem Reporting System: https://wdprs.internic.net/
>>> Last update of WHOIS database: 2017-07-17T04:21:32.0Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://www.icann.org/epp

TransIP
Realtime domeinregistratie en DNS-beheer vanaf 3,99 Euro!
https://www.transip.nl/domeinnaam/

This data is provided by TransIP
for information purposes, and to assist persons obtaining information
about or related to domain name registration records.
TransIP does not guarantee its accuracy.
By submitting a WHOIS query, you agree that you will use this data
only for lawful purposes and that, under no circumstances, you will
use this data to
1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via E-mail
(spam) or
2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes that apply
to this WHOIS server.
These terms may be changed without prior notice.
By submitting this query, you agree to abide by this policy.

  REGISTRAR KEY-SYSTEMS GMBH

  REFERRER http://www.key-systems.net

SERVERS

  SERVER net.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =digitalmethods.net

  PORT 43

  SERVER whois.rrpproxy.net

  ARGS digitalmethods.net

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain
RegrInfo
DOMAIN

  NAME digitalmethods.net

NSERVER

  NS1.SONOLOGIC.NL 178.63.120.201

  NS2.SONOLOGIC.NL 88.198.111.13

STATUS
ok https://icann.org/epp#ok

  CHANGED 2017-05-02

  CREATED 2008-03-03

  EXPIRES 2018-03-03

  REFERRER http://www.transip.nl

  REGISTERED yes

Erreurs

La liste suivante vous montre les fautes d'orthographe possibles des internautes pour le site Web recherché.